Milwaukee Community Journal

You are here: Home / Archives for environment

environment

Trump’s Policy Plans Signal Major Shifts for Black Communities

By Leave a Comment

By Stacy M. Brown

NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

@StacyBrownMedia

With the Trump administration preparing to take office in January, plans across numerous policy areas are likely to significantly affect Black Americans. From proposed changes to education funding to civil rights enforcement, early indicators suggest a series of shifts that could reshape access to resources, legal protections, and economic stability within Black communities. Here’s a look at the critical policies and potential outcomes that many might want to monitor under the new administration.

Education Policy

The Department of Education faces an uncertain future under Trump, who has proposed its elimination. This change would dismantle federal oversight on public education standards and divert funding currently allocated to Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). Black leaders are concerned that repealing Biden’s pledged HBCU funding would hinder efforts to address historical underfunding at these institutions. Trump has also indicated a desire to provide what he calls “reparations” for white students, citing perceived discrimination due to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) policies. If enacted, this approach could shift federal resources away from minority students to focus on what Trump describes as “equal access for all.”

Rule of Law

Trump has consistently signaled a reduction in the Department of Justice’s civil rights oversight, raising concerns among advocates. His approach would likely limit the DOJ’s role in addressing police misconduct and civil rights cases, including those involving voting rights protections. Such changes could result in fewer investigations into racial discrimination in police departments and might allow local jurisdictions to address—or ignore—cases of potential discrimination. For Black communities facing systemic challenges in the justice system, this could mean a significant loss of federal support for ensuring equal protection under the law.

Health Care Policy

The Trump administration has expressed an interest in reducing the scope of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and scaling back Medicaid. Any cuts to these programs stand to have a significant negative impact on Black Americans, who suffer disproportionately from chronic health conditions and high rates of uninsurance. A report by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that Black adults are twice as likely as white adults to rely on Medicaid. Reduced access to affordable health care could increase existing health disparities, particularly in states where Medicaid expansion under the ACA was instrumental in improving Black health outcomes.

Environmental Regulations

Under Trump’s prior administration, environmental protections were scaled back, impacting air and water quality in urban areas where Black Americans are more likely to live. Trump’s deregulatory stance could again see rollbacks on pollution standards and decreased enforcement against industrial polluters, particularly in cities where Black communities are exposed to disproportionately high levels of environmental toxins. According to a report by the NAACP, Black Americans are 75% more likely to live in neighborhoods adjacent to polluting facilities, putting them at greater risk of asthma, respiratory illnesses, and other health issues.

Civil Rights and DE&I Policies

Trump has proposed eliminating many diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) policies across federal agencies, which he argues is needed to combat “reverse discrimination.” This would halt DE&I training, reduce funding for DE&I initiatives, and could even lead to the retraction of DE&I programs in workplaces nationwide. Civil rights groups have raised concerns that ending DE&I policies could weaken protections and opportunities for Black Americans in government and private employment. Additionally, with plans to limit the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, discrimination protections in housing, employment, and education could be at risk.

Federal Poverty Policy

In previous statements, Trump has advocated for limiting welfare and SNAP benefits, aiming to reduce federal poverty assistance programs. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Black Americans are twice as likely as white Americans to live below the poverty line, making federal assistance essential for many Black families. Restrictions on these programs could create economic strain in communities already facing higher unemployment rates and limited access to generational wealth. Without strong safety nets, Black communities may experience increased financial instability and a reduced ability to recover from economic downturns.

Reproductive Health

Trump’s support for restrictive reproductive health policies could have far-reaching consequences for Black women, who already face higher maternal mortality rates. His administration’s stance on limiting reproductive services, including defunding clinics that provide abortion and contraception, could disproportionately affect Black women, especially those in underserved areas. According to the CDC, Black women are three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, partly due to limited access to quality reproductive healthcare.

Foreign Policy and Immigration

Trump has indicated that immigration restrictions could be expanded, with stricter enforcement and limitations on family-based immigration, which could affect Black immigrant communities from African and Caribbean countries. With around 4.6 million Black immigrants living in the U.S. (Pew Research), policies that increase deportation rates or restrict visas could destabilize families and communities with close ties to immigrants. Additionally, Trump’s foreign policy stance may deprioritize diplomatic relationships with African and Caribbean nations, limiting business, travel, and educational exchanges that have become vital to many Black Americans with familial or cultural connections abroad.

Trump’s Business Interests and Economic Policy

The Trump administration’s emphasis on corporate tax cuts and deregulation could benefit large corporations but may do little to address income inequality, which disproportionately affects Black Americans. Critics argue that policies focused on supporting corporations and high-income individuals could further limit investment in community programs, housing, and small business support. In these areas, Black communities often seek economic mobility. Data from the Economic Policy Institute suggests that tax policies benefiting corporations without targeted support for lower-income communities tend to increase economic disparities.

Technology and Digital Access

Trump’s approach to technology policy may reduce funding for broadband expansion, essential for improving internet access in underserved Black communities. The digital divide remains a persistent issue, with Pew Research reporting that Black Americans are less likely to have broadband access at home compared to white Americans. Policies that overlook digital equity could limit educational, employment, and healthcare access, further impacting Black communities that rely on affordable internet services for remote opportunities.

A Focus on Civil Rights and Equity

For Black Americans, the incoming Trump administration’s policies in these areas could signal significant shifts in daily life, from economic security and healthcare access to environmental justice and educational opportunity. As Derrick Johnson, President of the NAACP, noted, “Our rights, health, and economic well-being hinge on strong, equitable policies. It’s our job to stay vigilant and protect the progress we’ve made.”

Biden Administration Targets Lead Pipe Replacement Nationwide, Prioritizing Black Communities Facing Water Inequities

By Leave a Comment

By Stacy M. Brown
NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

@StacyBrownMedia

President Joe Biden took a significant step this week toward ensuring access to clean drinking water for all Americans, announcing a new EPA rule that mandates the replacement of lead service lines across the nation within ten years. Biden declared that his administration remains committed to “sprinting to the finish” in addressing environmental justice issues and securing clean water for historically marginalized communities.

Since day one, the president said his administration has prioritized the removal of lead pipes, with he and Vice President Kamala Harris committing to replace all lead pipes within a decade. The effort, part of the administration’s Lead Pipe and Paint Action Plan, doubles down on their focus on protecting public health, particularly in underserved areas. “No level of lead exposure is safe,” Biden emphasized, noting the devastating impacts of lead poisoning, especially on children and expectant mothers.

The NAACP recently released a report highlighting how unsafe drinking water affects Black communities disproportionately, using problems in Jackson, MS, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and other cities as examples. “Access to clean water is a fundamental human right,” the report stated, calling for immediate action from state legislators to enforce policies prioritizing clean water access in low-income and minority communities.

The report stressed that decisions on water infrastructure funding often occur at the state level, leaving marginalized communities vulnerable when funding priorities are misaligned. The NAACP urges lawmakers to “allocate funds for the modernization and maintenance of water systems” in areas that have suffered from long-term neglect.

Milwaukee and Nationwide Efforts

In Milwaukee, Biden declared that the city is progressing significantly thanks to a $30 million investment from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. With the funding, Milwaukee can replace its lead pipes within ten years instead of the previously projected 60-year timeline. The city also prioritizes disadvantaged communities in its lead pipe replacement efforts, partnering with other Midwest cities like Detroit to advance regional clean water initiatives. “Milwaukee is now a leader in the region,” Biden added, noting the city’s partnership with Detroit through the Great Lakes Lead Pipes Partnership, which aims to accelerate lead pipe replacement across the Midwest.

The Biden administration’s Lead and Copper Rule Improvements will mandate lead pipe replacement across the country, making this the first-ever national requirement. Since the rule was first announced, Biden has secured $15 billion specifically for lead pipe replacement, along with an additional $11.7 billion that can be allocated to drinking water projects and lead pipe removal. The funds will be directed, in part, toward disadvantaged communities bearing the brunt of lead contamination. “We are ensuring that every American can turn on their tap and drink clean water,” Biden said.

Beyond Milwaukee, cities across the United States benefit from Biden’s commitment to clean water. Detroit has accelerated its efforts, replacing over 8,000 lead pipes this year to replace all 80,000 lead pipes within a decade. With support from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the American Rescue Plan, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is on track to replace all its lead pipes by 2026. Similarly, Denver and St. Paul have received millions in federal funding, setting ambitious targets to eliminate lead pipes by 2032 and within a decade. “Lead poisoning is a major public health issue,” Biden reiterated, pointing to the irreversible harm it causes, especially in children.

Addressing Inequities in Water Access for Black Communities

The NAACP’s recent report highlights the persistent inequities in water access, particularly in Black communities, where outdated or poorly maintained infrastructure is often the norm. The report noted that industrial pollution and inadequate environmental regulations exacerbate water contamination in these areas. “Water filters and testing are typically not affordable for those who need them most,” the NAACP stated, emphasizing that low-income households face additional challenges in securing safe drinking water.

The Biden administration is also tackling toxic PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” which persist in the environment and have been linked to various health issues. Through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the administration has allocated $10 billion to combat PFAS contamination in drinking water. The EPA has finalized a national standard to address these chemicals, a move that will protect an estimated 100 million Americans from PFAS exposure. Biden emphasized that his administration is “working to ensure that every community is protected from harmful contaminants,” underscoring the need for comprehensive solutions that encompass both lead and PFAS.

Building a Foundation for the Future

To further expand access to clean water, the Biden administration is also investing over $5 billion in Tribal water infrastructure, recognizing that half of Tribal households currently lack access to basic drinking water and sanitation. The administration has launched 900 clean water infrastructure projects for Tribal Nations to address this gap. “Every level of government—state, federal, and local—bears the responsibility to ensure access to safe drinking water,” the NAACP stated, emphasizing the need for a coordinated response to water quality issues.

In Wisconsin alone, the Investing in America agenda has brought $7.2 billion in public sector investments, including funding for high-speed internet, transportation, and clean energy initiatives. The investments include $1.7 billion to expand high-speed internet to 72,000 homes and small businesses, and $4.1 billion to rebuild roads, bridges, and transit systems, demonstrating the breadth of Biden’s commitment to infrastructure and economic revitalization.

The NAACP report also outlines key recommendations for state and federal governments, including establishing emergency response plans for water crises, enforcing water quality standards, and community engagement in water policy decisions. “The input and well-being of all communities must be factored into water policies,” the report emphasized, advocating for a more inclusive approach to public health and safety.

Securing Clean Water for All

Biden’s latest clean water initiative is part of a broader strategy to ensure that every American has access to this basic necessity. “The well-being of our nation depends on safe drinking water,” Biden said. The administration’s ambitious agenda aims to modernize water systems across the country, create jobs, and foster economic stability while addressing the long-standing disparities in water access that have impacted communities of color.

“Access to clean water is a fundamental human right,” the NAACP stated, a sentiment that Biden echoed in his commitment to replace every lead pipe and safeguard this essential resource for future generations.

Historic Climate Legislation Called a Game Changer for Black America

By Leave a Comment

Eliminating pollution counts among the most significant victories in the bill. (Photo: iStockphoto / NNPA)

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent
@StacyBrownMedia

Consensus on climate provisions marks a historic step in the right direction for tackling the climate crisis that impacts Black people and people of color at disproportionate rates, the NAACP noted following Senate passage of the Inflation Reduction Act.

In a statement, the NAACP said Black and Brown communities have higher exposure to carbon emissions and all emission sectors.

Therefore, financial investment in climate issues and plans to reduce toxic emissions would be a vital step toward climate justice, the civil rights organization stated.

As the U.S. House of Representatives takes up the more than $700 billion economic package that includes healthcare, tax, and climate change, White House officials and climate justice activists said the bill would greatly benefit people of color.

“It puts the money with the mission. It’s a large amount of money, and the task in front of us is huge,” Felicia Davis, the co-founder of HBCU Green Fund.

Davis and White House Deputy National Climate Director Ali Zaidi joined the National Newspaper Publishers Association’s “Let It Be Known” to discuss the historic piece of legislation.

“The challenge has always been accessing the resources to do whatever. We all would love solar panels and drive electric cars,” Davis stated.

“This legislation gives lower-income families access to those things, and it will make resources available if you’re buying new or used electric vehicles. Also, the funds are now available for small businesses who might want to install electric charging stations.”

Zaidi said the legislation would successfully tackle problems associated with consumer costs. In addition, he said it would create family-sustaining wages and significantly reduce or eliminate pollution.

“It’s really important for families right now. On average, this legislation will help cut annual energy bills by hundreds of dollars by helping families access technologies that are often out of reach, especially for low-to-moderate income families,” Zaidi continued.

“Things like solar panels on your roof, a storage unit in your garage, switching to electric heat, or an electric stove. It’s often hard for people to afford that upfront cost, but the legislation provides rebates and tax credits of up to $14,000 for low-to-moderate income families.”

Zaidi called the legislation “a big deal.”

“It makes it a lot more affordable for families. The equivalent price of charging electric vehicles is $1.20 per gallon, a huge shift that will save money,” Zaidi asserted.

“Also, by creating jobs that folks can work in this industry, we’ve put in the bill a lot of incentives and rebates that will help Americans expand the use of technology and the requirements for an apprenticeship. People will be able to raise a family with this income.”

Eliminating pollution counts among the most significant victories in the bill, Zaidi continued.

“Black and Brown communities tend to be where pollution is heaviest, and they are usually left out and left behind,” he said.

“There’s a targeted focus with a $60 billion investment in environmental justice which recognizes this issue and takes it head on.”

The bill includes a minimum 15% tax on most corporations that make more than $ 1 billion a year in profits and $369 billion for climate action – the largest investment in the issue in American history.

Overall, the bill will allow the U.S. to cut the nation’s carbon emissions by 40 percent in less than a decade.

“We don’t want to miss this opportunity,” Davis warned. “This is game-changing – transformational. We’re starting at ground zero, and we must grab it.”

Click here to view the full discussion with Davis and Zaidi.

This Saturday: African American Culinary Heritage Plant-Based Cooking Class Debuts in Wisconsin

By Leave a Comment

 

“Black Americans are increasingly adopting a plant-based diet for reasons including health, food justice, and the environment,” saysJennifer Paul, MPH, RDN, a nutrition expert with the Physicians Committee for Responsible who helped develop the course curriculum. “The Food for Life: African American Culinary Heritage nutrition and cooking class series is intended to inspire and empower healthful eating with delicious and culturally appropriate plant-based recipes.” 

The series will honor the ancestral ties of West African foodways that were brought to the United States through the Middle Passage and the culinary traditions, such as soul food, developed by African Americans throughout their history in the United States.

Research shows the health benefits of adopting a plant-based diet for high blood pressure, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and breast,colorectal, and prostate cancers, all chronic diseases that, due to multiple socioeconomic factors, disproportionately affect African Americans.

According to a recent Pew Research Center survey, the number of African Americans who identify as vegan or vegetarian is more than double the overall number of Americans who identify as vegan or vegetarian.

Designed by physicians, dietitians, and other health experts, Food for Life classes promote healthful plant-based eating based on the latest scientific research. Each class includes information about how certain foods and nutrients work to promote or discourage disease, cooking demonstrations of delicious and healthful plant-based recipes, and practical cooking skills and tips for incorporating healthful eating habits into daily life.

 

Details for the Food for Life: African American Culinary Heritage plant-based nutrition and cooking class series are as follows:

Food for Life is a collaborative effort of physicians, researchers, and nutritionists who have joined together to educate the public about the benefits of a healthful diet for weight management and disease prevention. Based in Washington, D.C., Food for Life is a program of the nonprofit Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.

Stop Excluding People of Color in Environmental Policies

By Leave a Comment

By Dr. Benjamin F. Chavis, Jr
NNPA NEWSWIRE – Protecting the environment should be about protecting people, regardless of the color of their skin, their ethnicity or race, where they live or how much money they make. The fight to save our planet should be about ensuring a long and successful sustainable future – for everyone.
The deadly destruction wrought by the coronavirus pandemic has laid bare the harsh inequities in American society, disproportionately ravaging Black America and other communities of color, as well as individuals who were on the social margins long before the crisis.

 

The inequities have surfaced in obvious ways, including early data released by states showing that the virus is killing African Americans at disproportionately high rates, a disturbing trend that illustrates the substandard availability of health care in Black America.
The inequities have also surfaced in subtle ways, such as policy decisions that fail to reflect the needs and day-to-day realities of low-income communities and communities of color. The irony is that many of these policies are well-meaning. But in some cases, they also have had troubling unintended consequences.

 

Consider the area of environmental policy. Protecting the environment should be about protecting people, regardless of the color of their skin, ethnicity or race, or where they live or how much money they make. The fight to save our planet should be about ensuring a long and successful sustainable future – for everyone.

 

Yet, there are many in the mainstream environmental movement who continuously overlook the needs and realities faced by some of our most underserved and vulnerable communities. That includes the mainstream environmental advocacy community’s push to enforce plastic bags bans in favor of reusables, despite the fact that cardboard paper and other reusables pose a clear public health risk – especially for workers on the front lines of the pandemic response.

 

Why, for example, is it smart public policy to insist that grocery workers be exposed to reusable bags, when research shows these bags can be repositories of the COVID-19 virus? The majority of these essential workers are low-income people of color who are disproportionately bearing the brunt of the COVID-19 crisis, dying from the deadly disease at twice the rate of white people.

 

Additionally, in New York, it is well-documented that a statewide plastic bag ban also disproportionately hurts Black and Latino-owned businesses and shoppers. Though there is an exemption in this ban for recipients of benefits like WIC and food stamps from paying the five-cent tax on paper bags, working-class people of color and low-income New Yorkers still must pay.

 

Some stores have been charging for both plastic and paper, and in some cases,  more than five cents a bag. Five cents might not seem like much. But five cents (or more) per bag adds up, especially when one is living paycheck-to-paycheck, or, as is more likely at this moment, not working at all due to the financial toll of the COVID-19 crisis.

 

Some environmentalists have argued that opponents of the bag ban are trying to capitalize on the COVID-19 crisis by recommending a suspension of any bag regulations. Again, it appears that some mainstream environmentalists only use research data to support policies that reflect their privileged vantage point without respect to the impact of those policies on the underprivileged.

 

I coined the term environmental racism in 1982 while involved in the Warren County, NC protests against the digging of a PCB landfill in the heart of a poor Black agricultural community.  At that time there were some who thought that environmental issues were should not be considered as civil rights or as racial justice issues. There was in the past, and it continues in the current public discourse, a kind of arrogance by the privileged who think they know what is best for the underprivileged.

 

Today as the environmental justice movement has grown into a global campaign for change led by grassroots activists and leaders from people of color communities throughout the world, we all now know much more about the intersection between the issues of racial justice and environmental justice.

 

I recall vividly back in the late 1980’s when I co-authored and published the landmark study for the United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice: Toxic Waste and Race in the United States, the established environmental movement was unnerved that people of color would dare to do empirical research and define our own reality with respect to exposures to environmental hazards.  Our national study proved that there was a deliberate link between race and the placement of toxic waste facilities in America.

 

In adherence to a blind devotion to a privileged ideology, some who call themselves environmentalists often neglect to take into consideration the day-to-day concerns of millions of low-income and Americans of color living in urban centers that are also communities that house hazardous sanitation sites, incinerators, rail yards, power plants and other environmental threats.

 

Some mainstream environmental groups consistently insist on pushing for policies that make life harder for people of color and poor communities, arguing that the hardship – if they recognize it at all – is a necessary price to pay in order to achieve their overall goals that those of privilege have exclusively envisioned as the standard for all others to obey.
As the pandemic continues, we need to let go of high-minded ideological arguments and do everything possible to protect workers on the front lines – including grocery clerks and those who make deliveries. Some states have temporarily lifted their bans or eradicated them altogether. A number of grocery stores are bringing back plastic bags and telling customers not to bring their own reusable bags.

 

Due to the crisis, New York has twice extended non-enforcement of its plastic bag ban in the face of a lawsuit that challenges its constitutionality. This is not enough. The state should give essential workers and shoppers alike a sense of protection during the pandemic and bag the plastic ban altogether.

 

More often than not, these life-changing decisions are being made without the consultation or input from the affected communities of color. Close to 40 years later we still remain on the outside of these conversations, continuously overlooked by many in the mainstream environmental movement as well as in local and state governments.

 

There is an obvious divide between the members of the mainstream environmentalism movement and the environmental justice community, primarily made up of urban Black and brown people. Until both parties can come together and pay the necessary attention to the pervasive environmental concerns that our communities endure on a daily basis the rift will only deepen, if not completely fracture. Exclusion of people of color will not solve the nation’s or the world’s environmental challenges.

 

Dr. Benjamin Chavis is president and CEO of the National Newspaper Publishers Association.