• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise

Milwaukee Community Journal

  • News
    • Local News
    • National
    • World
    • Political
  • Men Building Men
  • Lifestyle
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Fashion
    • Culture
    • Religion
  • Economy
    • Small Business
    • Money
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Health
    • Family
    • Relationships
  • Education
  • Jobs
    • Housing
  • Scholarship Fund
You are here: Home / Archives for vulnerable populations

vulnerable populations

Congress Moves to Block Trump’s Social Security Assault

August 19, 2025 By MKE Community Journal Leave a Comment

By Stacy M. Brown
Black Press USA Senior National Correspondent

In its nonstop assault on the most vulnerable Americans, the Trump administration is preparing to impose sweeping cuts to Supplemental Security Income (SSI), a program that provides a lifeline for the nation’s poorest seniors, children, and severely disabled adults. The proposed rule would strip eligibility from hundreds of thousands and slash monthly payments by as much as one-third, even as new data confirms Social Security’s trust funds are facing insolvency within the next decade.

According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), nearly 400,000 people stand to lose critical income. That includes more than 275,000 who would see cuts of about $300 a month, and over 100,000 who could lose their benefits entirely. The changes target families already under strain, specifically SSI recipients living with relatives who receive SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Reversing Protections for Struggling Families

The Biden administration had expanded the definition of “public assistance household,” shielding recipients from the harshest penalties. That safeguard ensured that low-income families receiving food assistance would not be punished for offering shelter to an elderly parent or disabled child. Trump’s rollback would erase that protection, returning to outdated rules from 1980. “Receiving food assistance from SNAP would no longer be enough to qualify a family as a ‘public assistance household,” CBPP analysts warned. “The resulting SSI benefit cuts would be felt in low-income households with disabled family members or older relatives across the country”. The typical multi-person SNAP household with an SSI recipient survives on about $17,000 annually—well below the poverty line. Under the new rule, a woman with Down Syndrome living with low-income parents could see her benefits plunge from $967 to less than $700 a month, with families forced to track and report household expenses line by line.

Fallout Across the States

Every state would be affected. California could lose benefits for 57,600 people, New York 35,900, Florida 30,800, and Texas 23,600. Even small states like Vermont, Wyoming, and Alaska face losses. Advocates warn that the proposal would drive more disabled people into institutions, increase homelessness, and add crushing red tape. The cuts come as Social Security marked its 90th anniversary. Nearly 70 million Americans depend on the program, but the latest Trustees’ report projects its trust funds will be depleted by 2034, triggering an automatic 23% cut to monthly checks unless Congress acts.

Unions and Lawmakers Push Back

Unions and community groups are mobilizing. The AFL-CIO’s “It’s Better in a Union” bus tour stopped in Bakersfield, California, where California Nurses Association president Sandy Reding blasted the Trump budget bill as “a cruel piece of legislation that will have disastrous consequences for the most vulnerable in our communities, including the patients I care for in Bakersfield.” In Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) President Everett Kelley pledged to fight Social Security staffing cuts. “Across the country, we are using our voice—as workers, as parents, as people who care about our communities—to demand that this administration and Congress do whatever it takes to protect Social Security,” Kelley asserted. “The American people deserve nothing less.”

Democratic leaders are also taking action. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is preparing a September bill he calls the “Keep Billionaires Out of Social Security Act,” aimed at reversing Trump’s cuts, reopening shuttered field offices, and restoring staffing. “Social Security to me means my life,” said Ellen Carter, a New York recipient. “It means medicine gets paid; it means that I have a place to sleep at night.” Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced a companion bill in the Senate that would add $5 billion in funding, restore staff, safeguard data, and launch an investigation into the Department of Government Efficiency, which has overseen the Trump administration’s Social Security cutbacks. “Trump and his Republican allies have made it crystal clear—holding on to earned benefits requires vigilant defense,” Wyden said.

The Stakes for Millions

For the 7.5 million Americans who rely on SSI each month, including many with severe disabilities, the stakes are life and death. “For 90 years, we’ve kept America’s greatest anti-poverty success story alive,” Jessica Lapointe, president of AFGE Council 220, told reporters. “We serve widows, orphans, the elderly, disabled, every vulnerable soul in your families and your communities, and they deserve respect and dignity when they come for their earned benefits.”

Filed Under: Economy, Health Tagged With: AFGE, AFL-CIO, Alaska, American Federation of Government Employees, anti-poverty, california, California Nurses Association, CBPP, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, children, Chuck Schumer, cuts, Democratic leaders, Department of Government Efficiency, dignity, disabled adults, earned benefits, elderly, eligibility, Ellen Carter, Everett Kelley, Featured, Florida, homelessness, household expenses, insolvency, institutions, Keep Billionaires Out of Social Security Act, low income families, monthly payments, New York, orphans, poverty, protections, public assistance household, red tape, respect, Ron Wyden, Sandy Reding, seniors, SNAP, social security, SSI, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Supplemental Security Income, Texas, Trump Administration, trust funds, Vermont, vulnerable populations, widows, Wyoming

Trump Administration Rescinds Federal Funding Freeze After Court Ruling and Backlash

January 30, 2025 By MKE Community Journal Leave a Comment

American Politics and Policy – Money (Photo Credit by Douglas Rissing)

By Stacy M. Brown
NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent
@StacyBrownMedia

President Donald Trump’s administration on Wednesday rescinded a Project 2025-inspired order that had abruptly frozen most federal grants and loans, a sweeping directive that threw social service programs like Head Start, student loans, and Medicaid into disarray. The initial order, issued earlier in the week, sparked widespread confusion and disruption, prompting a swift legal challenge. On Tuesday evening, a federal judge temporarily blocked the freeze, and by Wednesday, the White House pulled back the directive altogether. The order’s reversal came after mounting pressure from lawmakers, advocacy groups, and affected organizations. The White House insisted the move was intended to “end any confusion” following the court’s injunction, but critics called it a political miscalculation. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said the administration backed down only because of public outcry. “Americans fought back, and Donald Trump backed off,” Schumer said in a statement. “Though the Trump administration failed in this tactic, it’s no secret that they will try to find another, and when they do, it will again be Senate Democrats there to call it out, fight back, and defend American families.”

However, the administration made clear that its broader policies on federal funding remain intact. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on X that this was “NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze,” but rather a rollback of the memo itself to “end any confusion” created by the court’s ruling. “The President’s executive orders on federal funding remain in full force and effect and will be rigorously implemented,” she added. The initial freeze caused immediate uncertainty, particularly in Washington, D.C., and Republican-leaning states heavily reliant on federal funds. Throughout Tuesday, the White House attempted to clarify exemptions—such as Medicaid—but the damage had already been done. Reports surfaced by people and organizations unable to access critical federal resources, heightening concerns about the real-world impact of the freeze.

The legal challenge that led to the order’s reversal was filed by Democracy Forward, a progressive nonprofit, which argued that the directive was an unconstitutional overreach that endangered millions of Americans. “While we hope this will enable millions of people in communities across the country to breathe a sigh of relief, we condemn the Trump-Vance administration’s harmful and callous approach of unleashing chaos and harm on the American people,” said Skye Perryman, the organization’s CEO. “Our team will continue to bring swift legal actions to protect the American people and will use the legal process to ensure that federal funding is restored.” The uncertainty caused by the administration’s actions drew sharp criticism from organizations that rely on federal assistance. Melicia Whitt-Glover, executive director of the Council on Black Health, warned that the confusion threatens health programs serving historically marginalized communities. “While the Council on Black Health is not fully reliant on federal funding, many of our partners are, and they now face disruptions that threaten their ability to continue their vital work. This impacts the communities we serve and exacerbates health inequities,” she said.

The administration’s actions have drawn scrutiny given the financial reliance of Republican-leaning states on federal aid. A MoneyGeek analysis found that seven of the 10 states most dependent on federal funding lean Republican, receiving an average of $1.24 for every dollar contributed, while blue states receive $1.14. New Mexico, a Democratic-leaning state, saw the highest return on federal spending at $3.42 per dollar contributed, while Delaware had the lowest at $0.46. Public Citizen, a government watchdog group, called the original freeze an unnecessary crisis that harmed vulnerable Americans. “The incompetence and cruelty of this order caused nationwide confusion and anxiety, as across the country regular Americans spoke out about the human impacts—the loss of jobs, essential services, and harms to children among many other vulnerable populations,” said Lisa Gilbert, co-president of the organization. “The White House overplayed their hand as they levied this Project 2025-inspired order and made it clear that they want to sow chaos and gut programs that help families. We will keep up the fight to make sure that does not happen.”

Filed Under: Economy, National News Tagged With: administration, constitutional overreach, Council on Black Health, Delaware, Democracy Forward, essential services, Featured, federal aid, federal funding, federal funding freeze, federal grants, federal judge, federal loans, federal resources, government watchdog group, head start, health inequities, historically marginalized communities, legal challenge, Lisa Gilbert, medicaid, Melicia Whitt-Glover, MoneyGeek, New Mexico, nonprofit, President Donald Trump, Project 2025, Project 2025-inspired order, Public Citizen, public outcry, Republican-leaning states, Senate Democrats, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Skye Perryman, social service programs, student loans, vulnerable populations, White House, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt

Federal Grants Freeze Exposes Disproportionate Impact on Red States, Showing Trump’s Willingness to Sacrifice His Own Supporters

January 29, 2025 By MKE Community Journal Leave a Comment

American Politics – Congress Political Divide – Partisan Politicians (Photo by Douglas Rissing)

By Stacy M. Brown
NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent
@StacyBrownMedia

The White House’s decision to pause federal grants and loans has sent shockwaves across Washington, D.C., and beyond, exposing vulnerabilities in Republican-leaning states that heavily depend on federal funding. In a memo issued Monday, acting Office of Management and Budget director Matthew J. Vaeth instructed federal agencies to halt all activities related to federal financial assistance, leaving questions about the legality and long-term impact of the directive. Federal funding plays a significant role in Washington, D.C., where $6.3 billion was allocated in fiscal year 2021 to support Medicaid, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), public schools, and infrastructure. These funds accounted for 32.2% of the district’s revenue. The freeze now threatens programs critical to D.C. residents, especially the city’s most vulnerable populations.

However, the impact of this freeze could hit Republican states hardest. According to data from MoneyGeek, seven of the 10 states most dependent on federal funding are Republican-leaning, with these states receiving an average of $1.24 for every dollar contributed. In contrast, Democratic-leaning blue states received $1.14 per dollar paid in federal taxes. New Mexico, a state that leans blue, saw the highest return on federal spending at $3.42 per dollar contributed, while Delaware, another blue state, had the lowest return at $0.46. Despite these outliers, higher-income, blue states generally contribute more to federal coffers than they receive, due to higher tax revenues and lower reliance on federal assistance.

Experts say the freeze will likely hit red states the hardest, as they are more dependent on federal funding. “Higher-income states produce the majority of the tax dollars that go into the federal government’s pocket,” Kathy Fallon, a human services practice area director at Public Consulting Group, told MoneyGeek in October. “Because of the higher income, states and their residents need less support and use fewer federal dollars.” Tax code changes in recent years have further increased the financial burden on wealthier blue states. “Before, people who paid large state income taxes would deduct those from their federal tax payments,” Fallon explained. “Now, state tax deductions are capped. Ironically, it means the wealthier states’ populations are paying even more.”

This dynamic should raise eyebrows and help showcase the irony of the Trump administration’s actions, as many of the most federally dependent states supported him and are likely to feel the sting of these new policies. While 31 states contributed more to the federal government than they received in 2024, 52% of these states were Republican-leaning, revealing a shift from previous years. Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) sharply criticized the order, saying, “Congress approved these investments, and they are not optional; they are the law. Donald Trump must direct his administration to reverse course immediately and ensure that taxpayer money goes where it’s needed.”

Experts warn that the legal authority for this freeze is tenuous. While the president can temporarily defer spending, significant pauses require formal notification to Congress and detailed justification. G. William Hoagland of the Bipartisan Policy Center expressed concerns about the broader implications. “This could be an effort to avoid implementing the law of the land as it relates to the budget process,” Hoagland said. “And the impact could be enormous.”

Filed Under: Economy, Latest News, National News Tagged With: 31 states, a human services practice area, a memo issued, a shift, a significant role, a state, according to data, accounted, acting, administration, all activities, allocated in fiscal year, an effort, another blue state, avoid implementing the law, before, billion, blue states, Budget director, capped, changes in recent years, Congress approved, contribute more, contributed more, D.C. residents, decision, deduct, Delaware, Democratic, depend, dependent, detailed justification, director, Donald Trump, enormous, every dollar contributed, experts, Experts warn, exposing vulnerabilities, expressed concerns, Featured, federal, federal agencies, federal assistance, federal coffers, federal financial assistance, federal funding, federal grants, federal tax payments, fewer federal dollars, freeze, from previous years, funds, further increased, G. William Hoagland, help showcase, higher tax revenues, higher-income, Higher-income states, immediately, In contrast, income taxes, infrastructure, instructed, investments, Ironically, is tenuous, Kathy Fallon, Leader Charles Schumer, leaning states, leans blue, leaving questions, less support, loans, long-term impact, lower reliance, Matthew J. Vaeth, Monday, MoneyGeek, most dependent, Needy Families, New Mexico, new policies, not optional, October, Office of Management, paid in federal taxes, paid large state, pause, paying, people, per dollar, per dollar contributed, produce, Public Consulting Group, public schools, raise eyebrows, receiving an average, red states, related, relates, Republican, Republican leaning, Republican states, require formal notification, residents, reverse course, Senate Minority, seven, sharply criticized, shockwaves, significant pauses, state tax deductions, states, support Medicaid, supported him, TANF, tax code, taxpayer money, temporarily defer spending, Temporary Assistance, the 10 states, the Bipartisan Policy Center, the broader implications, the budget process, the city, the directive, the district’s revenue, the federal government, the federal government’s pocket, the financial burden, The freeze, the higher income, the highest return, the impact, the irony, the land, the law, the legal authority, the legality, the lowest return, the majority, the most federally dependent states, the order, the president, the tax dollars, the Trump administration’s actions, the wealthier states populations, The White House, This dynamic, threatens programs, to Congress, vulnerable populations, Washington D.C., wealthier blue states

Primary Sidebar

MCJ WEEKLY

PREVIOUS EDITIONS

Go HERE for the Digital Archives

DR. TNT SCHOLARSHIP SPECIAL EDITION

CLICK THE IMAGE THE FULL EDITION

Newsletter Signup

The Milwaukee Community Journal (MCJ) and the Weekend Edition are distributed at a number of community churches; as is the current issue of Healthy Start. With many area churches closed for the next few weeks due to the coronavirus, your MCJ suggests you pick up your edition of the newspaper, Weekend Edition and Healthy Start at our offices, located at 3612 N. Martin Luther King Drive. We’re open from 10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. You can still pick up the MCJ at several Walgreens and Pick n’ Save stores throughout the community, as well as city hall and the county courthouse.

Recent Posts

  • American Men Have Been In Crisis for Generations. A Remedy from 1879 Offers Hope
  • Online registration now open for 2026 Back to School Festival
  • Oakland Protesters Rally to Defend Haitian Immigrants and TPS
  • OPINION: 57,000 Empty Apartments and Not a Word of Apology – City Limits
  • ‘Choppin’ it up’ with a brotha about Crowley’s win, and why Black folks aren’t down with the Democratic Socialists!

CLASSIFIEDS

CLASSIFIEDS

Place your notice of divorce, name change, etc. in the Milwaukee Community Journal's Classifieds! Contact is at 414-265-5300

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Tags

2016 election African Americans Alderman Khalif J. Rainey ALDERWOMAN CHANTIA LEWIS Alderwoman Milele A. Coggs annual Baylor College of Medicine Biden Black History Month Black press Boko Haram civil rights community coronavirus COVID-19 Dating Advice day Democrats diversity Donald Trump Education event Featured free George Floyd HuffPost Live Joe Biden Love & Sex Love and Relationships Mayor Tom Barrett mental health Milwaukee Repertory Theater naacp national NNPA pandemic racism report Republicans Reuters social media Trump Trump Administration What Is Working: Small Businesses White House

Categories

H5_WEDC1027_AA_300x250

Copyright © 2026 Milwaukee Community Journal