• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise

Milwaukee Community Journal

  • News
    • Local News
    • National
    • World
    • Political
  • Men Building Men
  • Lifestyle
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Fashion
    • Culture
    • Religion
  • Economy
    • Small Business
    • Money
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Health
    • Family
    • Relationships
  • Education
  • Jobs
    • Housing
  • Scholarship Fund
You are here: Home / Archives for Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action

MacKenzie Scott: A Philanthropy of the Spirit in an Age of Abandonment

October 29, 2025 By MKE Community Journal Leave a Comment

The 1st AACTA Awards were presented at the Sydney Opera House on 31 January 2012. The ceremony was preceded by a luncheon at the Westin Hotel in Sydney on 15 January 2012. (Wikimedia Commons / Photo by Eva Rinaldi)

By Stacy M. Brown
Black Press USA Senior National Correspondent

There are moments in history when a single act of generosity reveals the moral decay of an entire nation. MacKenzie Scott’s $38 million gift to Alabama State University, the largest in its 158-year history, is such a moment. It is not merely a financial transaction, nor the casual benevolence of the wealthy. It is a moral indictment against a society that has grown indifferent to the suffering of its Black citizens, against a government that starves their schools, and against a class of newly rich who have forgotten the communal obligations of success.

Dr. Quinton T. Ross Jr., the university’s president, called it a defining moment for Alabama State, and indeed it is. His words ring with the gratitude of those who have built excellence in the face of deprivation. “Ms. Scott’s generosity affirms Alabama State University’s reputation as a catalyst for excellence and innovation in higher education,” he said. But her act is more than affirmation. It is a resurrection, and a call to remember that Black institutions remain the crucibles of America’s moral and intellectual power. In recent weeks, Scott has dispersed her fortune with quiet conviction. Seventy million to the United Negro College Fund to strengthen endowments across thirty-seven member schools; sixty-three million to Morgan State University, her second gift to that campus in less than five years; and one hundred and one million combined to Morgan State and the University of Maryland Eastern Shore in a span of days.

Her giving, unshackled by stipulations or vanity, stands in luminous contrast to an era defined by greed and indifference. The plutocracy that dominates modern life often extracts from the many to enrich the few. Scott reverses that equation. She does not donate to dominate. She gives to repair. Her wealth, born of corporate conquest, has become the instrument of restoration. It stands as a redemption, perhaps, of what that very system has broken. One cannot ignore the symbolism of her actions. At a time when the federal government withholds support from historically Black institutions, when affirmative action has been dismantled, and when diversity programs are vilified, a white woman from the highest ranks of privilege has become the single most consistent benefactor of Black education in the nation. It is as though she has seen, from her rarefied vantage point, what America refuses to see: that the progress of its Black citizens is not a charity, but the measure of its own civilization.

Yet even as she gives, others remain silent. The silence of Black wealth resounds across the land. It is a silence that mocks the very principles of uplift once preached from our pulpits and classrooms. Attorney Benjamin Crump’s call to the wealthy—“If you’ve been blessed, you got to pass the blessing on”—echoes unanswered. The great sons and daughters of our race who have ascended to fortune, those who built empires on the faith of our people, turn their eyes away from the institutions that birthed them. They forget the hands that lifted them from obscurity. They forget that their wealth is not solely their own, but part of the moral economy of a people who have suffered together and triumphed together. The Black Press, like the HBCUs, stands as an unbroken monument to endurance. It has spoken truth through lynchings, wars, and betrayals. Yet it now faces extinction not from white suppression alone, but from the neglect of its own. “If the Black Press falls,” Crump warned, “so does the record of our struggle, our triumph, and our faith.”

Scott’s philanthropy, then, is not simply about money. It is about memory. The moral memory of a nation that has forgotten the debt it owes to those it once enslaved and now ignores. In her giving, she restores something elemental, the belief that one’s prosperity is meaningless if it does not lift others. W.E.B. Du Bois wrote of the “double consciousness” that afflicts the Negro in America, the struggle to see oneself through the eyes of a world that despises you. Today, the irony is reversed. America must learn to see itself through the eyes of those it has wronged. MacKenzie Scott, for all her privilege, seems to have glimpsed that truth. She gives the impression that she has looked into the soul of the republic and found it wanting.

Her actions do not absolve the sins of this nation. They reveal them. And in revealing them, they offer a path, not of atonement, but of accountability. For every dollar she gives to rebuild a school, there are a thousand more that others with power might give but will not. One woman has chosen conscience over complacency. The question that remains is whether the rest of America—Black and white alike—will choose to follow her example or remain comfortable in the quiet decay of its own moral poverty.

Filed Under: Economy, Education Tagged With: Affirmative Action, African American community, Alabama State University, American History, Benjamin Crump, Black education, Black excellence, Black institutions, Black press, Black wealth, community empowerment, corporate wealth, diversity, double consciousness, economic disparity, Economic Justice, education funding, Education Reform, ethical giving, Featured, federal government, generosity, HBCU, higher education, historically Black colleges, inequality in America, MacKenzie Scott, modern philanthropy, moral accountability, moral conscience, moral decay, moral indictment, moral responsibility, Morgan State University, Philanthropy, Quinton T. Ross Jr., racial equity, racial inequality, Racial Justice, Racial Progress, Social Justice, social progress, social responsibility, social uplift, systemic racism, United Negro College Fund, university endowment, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, W.E.B. Du Bois, wealth inequality, White Privilege

Resolution Honoring Charlie Kirk Becomes Critical Test for the Black Caucus

September 22, 2025 By MKE Community Journal Leave a Comment

The House of Representatives (Photo by Douglass Rissing)

By Lauren Burke

“This is the worst I’ve felt about this country in years,” said Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, standing on the House steps and talking about the state of play in the U.S.  “I can’t imagine anyone voting against this resolution,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) as members of the House, led by Republicans Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar, considered a resolution to honor Charlie Kirk. Kirk was murdered on September 10 during an outdoor appearance at Utah Valley University.

After much backroom maneuvering, the final vote on the resolution honoring Kirk was moved from Thursday to Friday, Sept. 18. For members of the Congressional Black Caucus, the vote is in no way a casual action on a boilerplate resolution. Charlie Kirk was known for critical comments on Black people and communities and targeted several Black women with negative comments, implying that they were successful only because of affirmative action. After a lengthy Democratic Caucus on the morning of September 18, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries listened to the concerns of members of his caucus. After the meeting, Black Press USA asked Leader Jeffries if he was whipping the vote and what he would vote. The Leader from Brooklyn gave no direct answers. “Members will vote their conscious. We will issue a statement shortly,” Leader Jeffries said flatly.

Texas Congressman Marc Veasey (D-TX) is countering Republicans with a more straightforward resolution worded to denounce political violence in the wake of Kirk’s murder.  But regarding the GOP’s Kirk resolution, several CBC members said they planned to vote “present.” Others are a solid NO. Some members in tight political districts are referencing their constituents but not giving clear answers on how they will vote. Typically, congressional resolutions are not controversial, but the Kirk resolution is all but certain to be in lieu of Kirk’s racist and misogynistic statements. The vote will be a test of where members draw the line on a continuous push by MAGA Republicans to engage in culture war politics. “I can’t stand the word empathy, actually,” Kirk once said. “I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that does a lot of damage,” he added.

“If I see a Black pilot, I’m gonna be like boy, I hope he’s qualified,” Kirk said on his show. But the issue of whether Black Democrats will separate the man from his statements and the violent way he died at only 31 while speaking at a college event with Kirk’s bigoted views will require messaging strategies Democrats often fail at — assuming they have a messaging strategy at all. “Black women do not have the brain processing power to be taken seriously. You have to go steal a white person’s slot,” Kirk said on his show in July 2023 as he attacked journalist Joy Reid, former First Lady Michelle Obama, that late Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, and Supreme Court Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson — all Ivy League graduates. It’s unlikely that any Congresswomen in the CBC will vote in favor of the Kirk resolution, but several may vote “present.” Republicans are presenting Kirk as a free speech martyr and burying any references to his racist statements. A “NO” vote will likely be followed by more GOP arguments that Democrats favor political violence and refuse to officially speak out against it.

Filed Under: Political Tagged With: Affirmative Action, Andy Biggs, Black pilot comment, Black Press USA, black women, Brooklyn, Charlie Kirk, Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional resolution, culture war politics, Democratic Caucus, Democratic strategy, Emanuel Cleaver, empathy quote, free speech martyr, GOP resolution, Hakeem Jeffries, House Speaker Mike Johnson, House steps, Ivy League graduates, Joy Reid, Ketanji Brown Jackson, MAGA Republicans, Marc Veasey, Michelle Obama, misogyny, murder, Paul Gosar, political controversy, political violence, racism, Republican messaging, September 10, September 18 vote, Sheila Jackson Lee, Utah Valley University

After Plunge, Black Students Enroll in Harvard

September 18, 2025 By MKE Community Journal Leave a Comment

Boston, Massachusetts, USA – October 9, 2023: Gate 1, the Newell Gate pedestrian entrance to Harvard University’s Soldiers Field Athletic Area. Atop the gate is the Harvard crest, logo, with three books and the word VERITAS (Truth). Two student pedestrians.

By Stacy M. Brown

Black Press USA Senior National Correspondent

Black student enrollment at Harvard Law School has rebounded. The incoming J.D. Class of 2028 includes 46 Black students, nearly returning to the averages seen between 2020 and 2023. That recovery comes only one year after the number collapsed to 19, the lowest since the 1960s.

The collapse of 2024 was severe. Harvard law professor David B. Wilkins told The New York Times, “This is the lowest number of Black entering first-year students since 1965.” He added, “This obviously has a lot to do with the chilling effect created by that decision.” In a statement, Sean Wynn, president of the Harvard Black Law Students Association, said the enrollment decline was a “crushing loss” and that “with this marked decline, the (Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action) ruling has broken something fundamental about the experience of attending this law school.” The chilling effect extended across higher education. Harvard College’s freshman class saw the share of Black students drop from 18 percent in 2023 to 14 percent in 2024. At the University of North Carolina, Black enrollment fell from 10.5 percent to 7.8 percent. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology reported a drop from 16 percent to 6 percent. Princeton’s Class of 2029 enrolled only 5 percent Black students, the lowest since 1968.

The source of these declines was the Supreme Court’s decision in 2023 to end race-conscious admissions. In his majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, “Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it.” The ruling overturned decades of precedent, closing a door that had offered Black students a measure of access to the nation’s most selective institutions. Harvard’s rebound this fall was driven not by structural change but by extraordinary efforts within its community. Black alumni and the Harvard Black Law Students Association launched new outreach and recruitment programs, according to The Harvard Crimson. Still, the rebound came even as Harvard shuttered diversity offices and ended a minority recruitment initiative for undergraduates. The numbers at Harvard show a fragile recovery. They are part of a larger struggle that continues in classrooms and courthouses across the country, where the future of access and opportunity for Black students is contested each year.

Filed Under: Education Tagged With: 1960s, 1965, 1968, Access, Affirmative Action, Black student enrollment, Black Students, Chief Justice John Roberts, chilling effect, civil rights, David B. Wilkins, diversity offices, Education Policy, enrollment decline, enrollment rebound, Harvard Black Law Students Association, Harvard College, Harvard Crimson, Harvard Law School, higher education, J.D. Class of 2028, minority recruitment, MIT, opportunity, outreach, precedent, Princeton, race-conscious admissions, Racial Discrimination, recruitment programs, Sean Wynn, selective institutions, Supreme Court decision, University of North Carolina

Why Is Elon Musk Trying to Buy a Wisconsin Supreme Court Seat?

April 1, 2025 By MKE Community Journal Leave a Comment

Elon Musk speaking at the 2025 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland. (Wikimedia Commons/ Photo by Gage Skidmore)

By Stacy M. Brown
BlackPressUSA.com Senior National Correspondent

Elon Musk, the billionaire owner of X (formerly Twitter), is reportedly pouring money into a campaign to unseat Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Janet Protasiewicz. According to a New Yorker investigation, the move appears to be part of a broader effort by conservative interests to tilt the ideological balance of key state courts ahead of the 2024 election. Wisconsin’s Supreme Court currently holds a 4-3 liberal majority. That balance could be jeopardized if Musk-backed operatives succeed in their push. Last year, Protasiewicz won her seat in a nationally watched race that saw record spending and turnout. Her win flipped the court’s ideological control after 15 years of conservative dominance.

Musk and others appear to be focused on redistricting. Soon after taking the bench, Protasiewicz and her liberal colleagues struck down the state’s heavily gerrymandered legislative maps. In response, Republican lawmakers began threatening to impeach her despite her decisive win by 11 percentage points. The New Yorker revealed that Musk is backing a coalition of far-right influencers and activists who aim to sway future Wisconsin elections by influencing the state’s high court. One such figure is Christopher Rufo, a conservative activist known for his crusade against diversity and inclusion programs. Rufo is reportedly working with others to develop a long-term plan to shape judicial outcomes in key battleground states. Though rarely stated outright, race may also be a motivating factor in these efforts. Several of the groups and individuals involved have targeted racial justice programs, equity initiatives, and policies that benefit Black communities. The push to dismantle DEI, undermine affirmative action, and redraw voting districts has consistently resulted in reduced political power for communities of color.

Wisconsin’s Supreme Court plays an outsized role in determining voting laws, redistricting, and potentially election outcomes. With a deadlocked state government, the court often serves as the final arbiter on matters like ballot access and election certification—raising concerns about outside influence. Rufo’s connection to Musk traces back to their shared presence on X, where they have frequently interacted. Musk has elevated Rufo’s posts and promoted his messaging, even while denying direct coordination. However, internal communications obtained by The New Yorker show a clearer pattern of collaboration, including a Musk-funded initiative to provide financial backing for Wisconsin-based conservative judicial campaigns. In a state where razor-thin margins decide presidential races, the makeup of the court could have major implications for the 2024 election. Wisconsin was one of the decisive states in both the 2016 and 2020 presidential contests.

The latest effort to shift the court’s composition highlights how billionaires and political operatives are focusing on once-relatively obscure judicial races. These races are now considered critical battlegrounds in national power struggles over voting rights, gerrymandering, and democracy itself. As Protasiewicz told The New Yorker, “The voters elected me. They knew exactly who I was. And they made their choice.”

Filed Under: Latest News, Local News, Political Tagged With: 2024 election, activists, Affirmative Action, ballot access, billionaire, Black communities, Christopher Rufo, conservative interests, DEI, democracy, diversity, election certification, election outcomes, Elon Musk, equity initiatives, far-right influencers, Featured, gerrymandering, ideological balance, Impeachment, Inclusion, judicial campaigns, Justice Janet Protasiewicz, liberal majority, New Yorker investigation, political power, Presidential Race, Racial Justice, redistricting, Republican lawmakers, state courts, twitter, voting districts, voting rights, Wisconsin Supreme Court, x

Return to Jim Crow: Federal Regulations Rolled Back to Allow Segregation

March 19, 2025 By MKE Community Journal Leave a Comment

By Stacy M. Brown
BlackPressUSA.com Senior National Correspondent

The Trump administration has blatantly resurrected segregation in federal contracting, undoing decades of civil rights progress by removing anti-segregation mandates. The alarmingly regressive move reopens the door for racially divided facilities, eerily reminiscent of the Jim Crow era, with potential “Whites Only” and “Colored” signage in government-funded workplaces. “This isn’t just a policy shift; it’s a moral catastrophe,” stated Melissa Murray, a constitutional law professor at New York University, in an NPR interview. “We are witnessing the deliberate dismantling of civil rights protections that generations fought to secure.” “We are witnessing the deliberate dismantling of civil rights protections that generations fought to secure,”

The changes, initiated without the customary public comment period, have been implemented to align with new executive orders on diversity, equity, and inclusion. However, this sudden shift has sparked accusations of undermining democracy and transparency. An anonymous federal employee expressed outrage to NPR. “This is an outright assault on democratic norms, a covert operation to reintroduce segregation without public scrutiny,” the unnamed employee remarked. The National Institutes of Health and other federal agencies have received directives to disregard previous anti-segregation clauses in their contracting processes. Inquiries to the General Services Administration about bypassing established procedural protocols were met with vague assurances. “The GSA is committed to implementing executive orders effectively and promptly,” GSA spokesperson Will Powell stated.

Kara Sacilotto, an attorney specializing in federal contracts, pointed out the broad attack on civil rights, noting that the targeting of these protections extends beyond racial lines to include gender identity, previously expanded under the Obama administration. “It’s clear the target is not just racial equality but all forms of civil rights progress,” Sacilotto explained. Professor Murray added, “This isn’t just a rollback of civil rights protections—it’s a signal that we’re stepping back into a darker past, one that we’ve worked hard to move beyond.”

Filed Under: Latest News, National News Tagged With: Affirmative Action, anti-discrimination laws, civil rights, civil rights protections, constitutional law, DEI policies, discrimination laws, diversity equity inclusion, employment policies, Executive Order 11246, Featured, federal agencies, federal contracting, federal contractors, gender identity, General Services Administration, government policies, GSA, OFCCP, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, procurement practices, public scrutiny, racial equality, segregation, Trump Administration, workplace diversity

COMMENTARY: The Fight to Save Affirmative Action for All of Us

November 16, 2022 By MKE Community Journal Leave a Comment

By Emil Guillermo

Don’t think for a second that Asian Americans are rooting to end affirmative action.

You might get that impression as the Supreme Court heard two cases concerning the use of race in college admissions at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.

The Harvard case in particular has Asian American plaintiffs represented by a group called Students for Fair Admissions, or SFFA.

Don’t be misled. The group isn’t representative of Asian Americans at all. They’re a minority within a minority. National polling data of Asian American voters show that nearly two-thirds actually support affirmative action.

What you’re witnessing is a classic “divide and conquer” strategy, where some Asian Americans are being used by a white anti-civil rights activist named Ed Blum, who has dedicated his life to upending diversity and race equity in society from voting rights to higher ed.

And now it looks like his time has come.

Remember, conservatives aren’t automatically against affirmative action. The late Justice Sandra Day O’Conner wasn’t—totally. To the court’s credit, it’s always allowed for race to be addressed within reason. No quotas, of course. But race has always been allowed as a factor.

Then came 2012, the Fisher v. Texas case, where Blum hand-held a white female plaintiff in an attempt to destroy the use of race in admissions at the University of Texas. It didn’t work, but Blum learned a lesson.

He realized he didn’t have a perfect victim. That was clear when even Antonin Scalia wondered aloud what the damage was to the white Fisher when she was not able to gain admission in a process where she had to compete fairly against people of color.

Indeed, what was the harm? The cost of the application fee?

So, this time, Blum found aggrieved rejections from Harvard and UNC on the internet. And he found a large group of plaintiffs among a new generation of Asian Americans immigrants from the 1990s and after, or rather their sons and daughters.

They were the ones who never quite understood why their little darlings with the straight A’s and perfect scores would be rejected from Harvard.

They have enabled Blum’s yellow-faced attack against affirmative action.

It’s created a civil war between Asian Americans, only the Mason/Dixon line is the year of your family’s immigration.  1980s? ’90s? 2000s?

These are the folks within our community who have been used by Blum in an attempt to topple this thing in society that has allowed previous generations of not just Asian Americans, but all people of color, and women, and anyone else who has been qualified, to break through the color barriers in life.

They just needed that benevolent boost we’ve known as “affirmative action.”

It’s impossible to say exactly how the court will come down on the Harvard and UNC cases. You can’t really tell by the questions asked by the justices.

Clarence Thomas took a swing at UNC by questioning the educational value of diversity.

“I didn’t go to racially diverse schools, but there were educational benefits,” he said. “And I’d like you to tell me expressly when a parent sends a kid to college, that they don’t necessarily send them there to have fun or feel good or anything like that; they send them there to learn physics or chemistry or whatever their study. So, tell me what the educational benefits are.”

North Carolina Solicitor General Ryan Park, arguing for UNC, spoke of the benefits of racial diverse environments, but not to Thomas’ satisfaction. “Well, I guess I don’t put much stock in that because I’ve heard similar arguments in favor of segregation, too.”

Thomas would be indicative of the hardline conservative attitude.

But the court’s first African American female was there, too. Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioned the SFFA attorney about the harm the race conscious approach had in admissions. The SFFA attorney couldn’t speak to any significant harm and admitted that even whites benefitted from the system now in place.

So, why even bother with the plaintiff’s SCOTUS appeal if the lower courts have already decided Harvard and UNC’s programs weren’t discriminatory?

Well, the only thing that’s changed is the six solid, unyielding conservative justices in the high court.

You saw what they did to abortion. Would they do the same thing to affirmative action?

In a heartbeat.

That’s what worries people. A decision is expected in 2023. I’m being optimistic while I still can. Affirmative action has been a considerable tool to fight racism. Without it there’d be no BIPOC middle class.

So, what’s the ultimate way to beat a court hell-bent on playing politics?

Emil Guillermo is a journalist and commentator. He does a webshow on www.amok.com

Filed Under: National News Tagged With: Affirmative Action, Asian Americans

Affirmative Action Remains MIA in Trump Administration – Where is the Outcry?

April 22, 2020 By MKE Community Journal Leave a Comment

Beyond the Rhetoric 864

By

Harry C. Alford & Kay DeBow

There seems to be a very strange quiet regarding all organizations that claim to be defenders of Civil Rights and protectors of our hard-fought liberties won through the results of institutions that fought against segregation, lynchings and bloody demonstrations. Dr. Martin Luther King, Medgar Evers and others are “rolling in their graves” as the current White House has just disassembled the hard-fought victories of the 1990’s.

Reacting to the dismal state of our economy and the pandemic of the Coronavirus, the White House sponsored the infamous CARES Act. This new program relieves all federal agencies of any responsibilities regarding the Civil Rights Act or Affirmative Action. Basically, all departments can set aside any enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1965. Minorities such as Blacks, Hispanics, females and virtually all entities that are not white males can no longer feel protected.

Also, and worst, historical groups that are known as protectors of basic civil rights are not uttering a word. Where is the NAACP? Urban League? National Action Network etc. during this controversy? Potential contracts and financial agreements are being snatched away by the billions of dollars. “This is going to set back Black families by generations”, says Harry C. Alford, President and Co-Founder of the National Black Chamber of Commerce. “We are beginning the fight and it is rather lonely. The momentum must build as we go.”

Last week, the Chamber led a 2,000 participant “Call to Action”. “We are getting a constant flow of new members joining us in this fight”, Alford states. “We are in disbelief and we better snap out of it as soon as possible.”

As written, the Affirmative Action law is suspended for ninety days and authorizes ninety-day extinctions thereafter. This means the drought can last for years before being permanently cancelled.

We must begin to fight with all our hearts if we do not want this tragedy to turn into a most terrible nightmare for our children and thereafter.

Raise your hand if you have heard of Arthur Fletcher. He was known as the “father of Affirmative Action”.

According to the Seattle Times, after Richard Nixon’s election, he appointed Fletcher Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment Standards. With responsibility for the wage and hour regulations for the nation’s workforce and supervision of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance, Fletcher now had the power to revoke federal contracts and keep contractors from bidding on future work.

On June 27, 1969, Fletcher implemented the nation’s first federal affirmative-action program, which required federal contractors to meet specified goals in minority hiring for skilled jobs in the notoriously segregated construction industry.

But after two years, Fletcher’s affirmative-action programs had earned him so much enmity among the leaders of the skilled construction unions that he was forced to resign.

President Nixon gave him a brief assignment on the United Nations delegation under Ambassador George H.W. Bush that created a lifelong friendship.

Arthur Fletcher, our mentor, travelled the world with us to Brazil, Cuba, and countries in Africa as we sought contracts for our members.  He once told us the story of him being held against his will inside the Palmer House Hotel in downtown Chicago by construction union goons. He felt his life was in danger and frantically called the White House.

As the story goes, President Richard Nixon made an immediate direct phone call to Chicago Mayor Richard Daily and shouted:  “If my man is harmed you are going to wake up to the marching of the 101st Airborne down Michigan Avenue.”  The bigots backed off.

Gone are those days of courageous leadership. We just wish they would return. Oh, how nice it would be for our nouveau leaders to stand up in a courageous manner such as Louis Sullivan, Art and of course Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

We have a lot to lose if we do not wake up and protect the things we have fought so dearly to win.

 

Mr. Alford is the Co-Founder, President/CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce ®. Ms. DeBow is the Co-Founder, Executive Vice President of the Chamber.

Emails:  [email protected]  [email protected] www.nationalbcc.org

April 21, 2020

Filed Under: National News Tagged With: Affirmative Action, CARES Act, civil rights, Donald J Trump, Dr. Martin Luther King, Medgar Evers

Primary Sidebar

MCJ WEEKLY

PREVIOUS EDITIONS

Go HERE for the Digital Archives

DR. TNT SCHOLARSHIP SPECIAL EDITION

CLICK THE IMAGE THE FULL EDITION

Newsletter Signup

The Milwaukee Community Journal (MCJ) and the Weekend Edition are distributed at a number of community churches; as is the current issue of Healthy Start. With many area churches closed for the next few weeks due to the coronavirus, your MCJ suggests you pick up your edition of the newspaper, Weekend Edition and Healthy Start at our offices, located at 3612 N. Martin Luther King Drive. We’re open from 10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. You can still pick up the MCJ at several Walgreens and Pick n’ Save stores throughout the community, as well as city hall and the county courthouse.

Recent Posts

  • Oakland Protesters Rally to Defend Haitian Immigrants and TPS
  • OPINION: 57,000 Empty Apartments and Not a Word of Apology – City Limits
  • ‘Choppin’ it up’ with a brotha about Crowley’s win, and why Black folks aren’t down with the Democratic Socialists!
  • Identifying Opportunities to Strengthen Wisconsin’s Emergency Response
  • Present Music Highlights Women Composers in Woman’s Club of Wisconsin’s 150th Celebration

CLASSIFIEDS

CLASSIFIEDS

Place your notice of divorce, name change, etc. in the Milwaukee Community Journal's Classifieds! Contact is at 414-265-5300

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Tags

2016 election African Americans Alderman Khalif J. Rainey ALDERWOMAN CHANTIA LEWIS Alderwoman Milele A. Coggs annual Baylor College of Medicine Biden Black History Month Black press Boko Haram civil rights community coronavirus COVID-19 Dating Advice day Democrats diversity Donald Trump Education event Featured free George Floyd HuffPost Live Joe Biden Love & Sex Love and Relationships Mayor Tom Barrett mental health Milwaukee Repertory Theater naacp national NNPA pandemic racism report Republicans Reuters social media Trump Trump Administration What Is Working: Small Businesses White House

Categories

H5_WEDC1027_AA_300x250

Copyright © 2026 Milwaukee Community Journal